TY - JOUR
T1 - Anterior Colporrhaphy and Paravaginal Repair for Anterior Compartment Prolapse
T2 - A Review
AU - Tsui, Wing Lam
AU - Ding, Dah Ching
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Pelvic organ prolapse, particularly in the anterior compartment, is a prevalent condition that significantly impacts women’s quality of life. Two common surgical approaches for managing anterior vaginal wall prolapse are anterior colporrhaphy and paravaginal repair. Anterior colporrhaphy, a traditional technique, involves the plication of weakened fascial tissues to restore support to the bladder and anterior vaginal wall. Paravaginal repair addresses lateral detachment of the anterior vaginal wall by reattaching it to its supportive structures. This review aimed to compare the indications, techniques, and outcomes between these surgical methods, discussing their efficacy, recurrence rates, and complications. Although anterior colporrhaphy is widely used, paravaginal repair may offer superior results in specific cases, particularly those involving lateral defects. The review also explored the evolution of these techniques, the role of grafts and mesh, and the potential benefits of minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery. The goal is to provide clinicians with comprehensive insights into choosing the appropriate surgical option based on individual patient anatomy and clinical presentation, thus optimizing outcomes and minimizing recurrence.
AB - Pelvic organ prolapse, particularly in the anterior compartment, is a prevalent condition that significantly impacts women’s quality of life. Two common surgical approaches for managing anterior vaginal wall prolapse are anterior colporrhaphy and paravaginal repair. Anterior colporrhaphy, a traditional technique, involves the plication of weakened fascial tissues to restore support to the bladder and anterior vaginal wall. Paravaginal repair addresses lateral detachment of the anterior vaginal wall by reattaching it to its supportive structures. This review aimed to compare the indications, techniques, and outcomes between these surgical methods, discussing their efficacy, recurrence rates, and complications. Although anterior colporrhaphy is widely used, paravaginal repair may offer superior results in specific cases, particularly those involving lateral defects. The review also explored the evolution of these techniques, the role of grafts and mesh, and the potential benefits of minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery. The goal is to provide clinicians with comprehensive insights into choosing the appropriate surgical option based on individual patient anatomy and clinical presentation, thus optimizing outcomes and minimizing recurrence.
KW - anterior colporrhaphy
KW - anterior compartment
KW - paravaginal repair
KW - pelvic organ prolapse
KW - surgery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85210439654
U2 - 10.3390/medicina60111865
DO - 10.3390/medicina60111865
M3 - 文献综述
C2 - 39597050
AN - SCOPUS:85210439654
SN - 1010-660X
VL - 60
JO - Medicina (Lithuania)
JF - Medicina (Lithuania)
IS - 11
M1 - 1865
ER -